Comments on: Pro Bono logo http://carrotblog.com/pro-bono-logo Improving your site Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:07:49 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Kiren http://carrotblog.com/pro-bono-logo/comment-page-1#comment-2443 Kiren Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:18:16 +0000 http://carrotblog.com/?p=1343#comment-2443 Very cool design, one thing though is the look of it being incomplete with those gaps at the edges where the branches extend. Are they there to appear more like leaves on the tree image? Just curious. Very cool design, one thing though is the look of it being incomplete with those gaps at the edges where the branches extend. Are they there to appear more like leaves on the tree image? Just curious.

]]> By: Chris Petescia http://carrotblog.com/pro-bono-logo/comment-page-1#comment-2398 Chris Petescia Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:54:18 +0000 http://carrotblog.com/?p=1343#comment-2398 Thanks for the comment! Sorry for the delay, I just saw it now . The tree illustration started off as a Cottonwood tree (there is a 100 year old one in the park), but evolved into the symmetrical form it has now. However, we did try to nod to the Mulberry Trees with by receding the brown tone back from the edge of the green a bit (see images of Mulberry Trees): <a href="http://bk.ly/WV" rel="nofollow">http://bk.ly/WV</a> . Still, you're right - at closest, it's an abstracted and very simplified tree form that isn't immediately identifiable as one of the Park trees. Thanks for the comment! Sorry for the delay, I just saw it now . The tree illustration started off as a Cottonwood tree (there is a 100 year old one in the park), but evolved into the symmetrical form it has now. However, we did try to nod to the Mulberry Trees with by receding the brown tone back from the edge of the green a bit (see images of Mulberry Trees): http://bk.ly/WV . Still, you're right – at closest, it's an abstracted and very simplified tree form that isn't immediately identifiable as one of the Park trees.

]]> By: OdinLiamWright http://carrotblog.com/pro-bono-logo/comment-page-1#comment-2396 OdinLiamWright Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:04:25 +0000 http://carrotblog.com/?p=1343#comment-2396 You Def Got Skillz. You Def Got Skillz.

]]> By: plello http://carrotblog.com/pro-bono-logo/comment-page-1#comment-2395 plello Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:08:17 +0000 http://carrotblog.com/?p=1343#comment-2395 Wow, I really like this. Pairing the tree/green with the bridge communicates this campaign beautifully. I love the colors and the creativity of it. <br>Awesome job! Wow, I really like this. Pairing the tree/green with the bridge communicates this campaign beautifully. I love the colors and the creativity of it.
Awesome job!

]]> By: kevindonnigan http://carrotblog.com/pro-bono-logo/comment-page-1#comment-2393 kevindonnigan Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:18:16 +0000 http://carrotblog.com/?p=1343#comment-2393 Very nice! Very nice!

]]> By: amyblumenthal http://carrotblog.com/pro-bono-logo/comment-page-1#comment-2392 amyblumenthal Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:29:37 +0000 http://carrotblog.com/?p=1343#comment-2392 Hey there!<br><br>I'm a fan of the hybrid imagery of the bridge and the tree into one logo, but I am unsure if the tree will start to look a little like these tree icons: <br><br><a href="http://www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/8849363/2/istockphoto_8849363-simple-tree-icons.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_appro...</a><br><br>I'm also wondering, is the logo used mainly for the web? I'm definitely a fan of the simplicity of it, but maybe you could turn the tree that resembles the ones that are specific to the Brooklyn area; that would be really cool & probably more unique to the park's identity. Don't know entirely what type of trees those would be, but just something to look into maybe :) But overall, I like the direction you're going with this logo; hope this helps! Hey there!

I'm a fan of the hybrid imagery of the bridge and the tree into one logo, but I am unsure if the tree will start to look a little like these tree icons:

http://www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_appro...

I'm also wondering, is the logo used mainly for the web? I'm definitely a fan of the simplicity of it, but maybe you could turn the tree that resembles the ones that are specific to the Brooklyn area; that would be really cool & probably more unique to the park's identity. Don't know entirely what type of trees those would be, but just something to look into maybe :) But overall, I like the direction you're going with this logo; hope this helps!

]]>