Close and Go Back
  • Carrot Creative
  • Carrot Blog
  • Carrot Labs
  • Zoo Venture Group
  • paperclip

    Adam Ostrow at Mashable has a great post about whether or not social media is hurting or helping corporate websites. Current brands, Vitamin Water is the example in the post, are sending fans and users to social sites like Facebook or MySpace to engage with a campaign versus the traditional corporate website.

    The benefits of sending to social sites are obvious including more interaction and an easier way to gather a group of users interested in your brand versus sending them to a corporate website.

    Adam hits the point with something we’ve been saying for awhile: get your fans in one place. While corporate websites are great for branding and having a secure presence for all the information about your company, many are static and not interactive. Plus, you’re not offering any incentive to come back to the site and collect information about all of the interested people clicking.

    By driving people to Facebook and having them simply click that they’re a FAN of the brand, you’ve got them. You may not have really exciting stuff to give them now, but that doesn’t mean you won’t later on. For your already loyal set of fans, they’ll gladly join the page. And for the “fans on the fence” or new fans, you’ll be able to entice them on a place they’re already familiar with.

    Here are a few doing a great job in driving folks to their social sites:

    • Universal Pictures: While they have set up basic websites for some of their summer movies, Universal is also sending fans to designated Facebook Fan Pages. (The official Bruno website is actually a MySpace pageLand of the Lost. Drag Me to Hell. Public Enemies. Bruno. Funny People.  (I have to wonder what the marketing team at Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian is thinking about this. There site isn’t interactive at all besides a simple game, which is comparable to most movie sites. Think about all of the interaction they could have had on social media with the characters and content!)
    • Southwest Airlines: The crafty crew at Southwest Airlines set up a photo contest using their official Twitter account where users submitted a  photo of a very specific travel or tourism-related picture. The company offered a travel package to the winners. If you check out the Twitter account, you can already see the overwhelming response. Why? Well, it’s easy. A simple upload of a photo and a tweet takes 2 minutes. Plus, people are on Twitter and thus familiar with the platform. Sending people to the official Southwest Airlines website for a contest would be a bit odd wouldn’ it?
    • Skittles: And then of course there is Skittles.com, which is completely shifted into a social site. (Right now it’s YouTube. In the past, Twitter and Wikipedia were the backdrop of the site.) We all remember the backlash, but there website still has everything on it to get more information about their company from a social media perspective.

    What do you think? What other corporate sites are driving people to social media sites?

    filed in:

    tags:

    Comments

    • Great article and I agree with you that ..... Thanks for the tips!
    • What I have observed is, it's been helping corporate websites in a big way! I am sure many would agree on this!

      Debra
    • As social media continues to evolve and expand into mainstream consciousness, to not concede to its dominance, adapt, and apply interactive strategies into an overall marketing approach is to fail. Pretty soon, there will be an expectation that all brands have a new media presence, which will certainly "up the competition ante" and force continued innovation. Exciting times indeed.

      When I first saw the Vitamin Water ads, I have to admit that I was somewhat surprised that the company would drive traffic to its Facebook profile. After processing what I had just seen, I realized that--as you've pointed out in this post--it's a clever strategy: hook people into the product. Especially with Facebook's live stream framework, from the brand's perspective, it's a no-brainer, because my "I'm a fan of ..." will appear to hundreds of my friends. The potential for a viral explosion is obvious.

      Traditional ads don't influence me much anymore. Perhaps that is because I'm a new media addict who's young, but nevertheless, you'll need a creative hook to get my attention. All of the companies that are mentioned in this post succeeded in that regard.

      Nevertheless, I'm tired of Vitamin Water; I drank a ton of it when I was a law student in Manhattan between 2002 and 2003, and I'm done. The traditional "bus stop and subway station" ads got me then, but no form of clever social media strategies can get me back on that bandwagon. (I will always be influenced by urban ads, especially those on the subway. I've known Dr. Zizmor for as long as I can remember the subway.)
    • I think the greatest potential lies - not just in social media site unilaterally replacing traditional corporate websites - but in allowing brands to reach a much more targeted audience. This can range from broad demographics - see Dell's recent Della Failure - to very specific niche audiences Office Depot's Office Depot Saves Small Businesses Campaign - in which they create a social forum for their primary consumer base - to GE's GEReports.com - which builds content based on the comments posted in a hybrid media outet/blog/social platform. If I am a brand, why should I have only one website. These don't need to be 'replacements' rather, complements. No brand's online presence will be complete until they have a main page supplemented by as many targeted microsites as they need to reach there consumer base, and untapped markets.
    blog comments powered by Disqus