Close and Go Back
  • Carrot Creative
  • Carrot Blog
  • Carrot Labs
  • Zoo Venture Group
  • paperclip

    Has anyone else noticed an abundance of Social Media Guidelines and books being sent around lately? I feel like I’ve received a ton this week. Razorfish released their Fluent Report. 360i put one out.

    I really want to read these. I do. (I’m halfway through the Razorfish one and it’s awesome.) These companies know what they’re talking about and have teams of extremely smart people pulling together ideas to share and make the industry a better place. But, in a world where I get much of my news in 140 character increments, it’s hard to find the time to read a 50+ page e-book in one sitting about social media, why people should engage, use Twitter, blog, etc… Sure, I can download it to my iPhone (or Kindle if I had one)and read it on my commute on the A train. I can also kill a few dozen trees and print it out to read. But in the end, I had to think: “0will I really put that time into reading this, and will I actually learn something from it?”

    When will we not need the full books and just rely on hard hitting statements in short microblogging formats. For example, a 3 page description and research finding on why brands should be in social media can probably be represented in less than 140 characters: “It’s where your audience is” While this doesn’t provide additional evidence and supporting statements, it gets to the point. Maybe we can have both. A combination of defining these reports into a much shorter form version that we’re all used to. The short version would include bold statements about what the overall summary really includes. If you need more, you can get it. If not, then move on.

    I think this could work. And, more people would read them. 50+ pages is still intimidating to some.

    What do you think? Would you move to keep the more in depth reports or simple statement summaries to be released by these big agencies??

    filed in:

    tags:

    Comments

    • Tom Hosford
      In depth reports will always be necessary in some form. Statements like "it's where your audience is" are great in that they get to the point, but you need the data available to back it up. Whats a claim worth if it's not supported with evidence?

      I do agree that summaries and bolded points should be provided, if you trust the source and are just looking to get the drift.
    • Fabio Vitale
      It is interesting the way you put it. On your business field, business communication, it is a necessity to provide short, straight to the point info. On the other hand, on other areas the argument must be supported by at least some evidence. Tests must have been made and shown in order to convince the audience. Obvious information is easily absorbed, while a new method, idea, or even media must be proved of. Anyways, I am a lawyer and use my computer all day long. I read books in pdf or html, but It is is till not the same as paper. Now, I admit that I totally retired the newspaper.
    • Devin
      Actually, I skimmed a few pages to see if there were points I didn't know -- an in-depth report can easily be all fluff or full of interesting info. Indeed, my dead-tree copy had some pretty good reading.
    • It's all about what you're looking for. Some people learn from analysis---some learn from the points.
    blog comments powered by Disqus